THE PEDAGOGICAL PRINCIPLES AND EFFECTIVENESS OF UTILIZING CHATGPT FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, language learning, chatGPT, pedagogical principles, innovative approaches, instructional methodologies, language acquisition theories, interactive instruction, instructional effectiveness.Abstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has engendered innovative approaches to language learning, revolutionizing conventional instructional methodologies. This study delves into the fusion of ChatGPT, an AI-powered language model, with pedagogical principles to ascertain its efficacy in augmenting language learning experiences. The research explores the symbiotic relationship between ChatGPT and established language acquisition theories, dissecting how it facilitates interactive, personalized, and engaging language instruction. Through a comprehensive mixed-methods approach involving both learners and educators, the study unveils a substantial positive correlation between ChatGPT integration and perceived effectiveness, substantiating its potential to revolutionize language pedagogy. The findings illuminate the significance of synergizing pedagogical underpinnings with technological innovation, advocating for the seamless integration of ChatGPT to invigorate language learning and elevate learner outcomes
References
Blau. I., Shamir-Inbal, T., and Avdiel O. How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722.2020.
Zamora-Polo. F., Corrales-Serrano. M., Sanchez-Martín. J., & Espejo-Antunez. L. Nonscientific university students training in general science using an active-learning merged pedagogy: Gamification in a flipped classroom. Education Sciences, 9(4), 297. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040297.2019.
Abutabenjeh. S., and Jaradat. R. Clarification of research design, research methods, and research methodology: A guide for public administration researchers and practitioners. Teaching Public Administration, 36(3), 237-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739418775787.2018.
Rutberg. S., and Bouikidi. C.D. Focusing on the fundamentals: A simplistic differentiation between qualitative and quantitative research. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(2), 209-213. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shannon-Rutberg/publication/328250766_Focusing_on_the_Fundamentals_A_Simplistic_Differentiation_Between_Qualitative_and_Quantitative_Research/links/5eea3789299bf1faac5e6bfb/Focusing-on-the-Fundamentals-A-Simplistic-Differentiation-Between-Qualitative-and-Quantitative-Research.pdf.2018
Legault. L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 2416-2419. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1139-1.2020
Handelzalts. A. Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams. In Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning (p. 159-173). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6_9.2019
Hayath.T.M., Kant Gupta. S. Pedagogical Principles in Learning and Its Impact on Enhancing Motivation of Students.Technoarete Transactions on Applications of Information and communication Technology (ICT) in Education Vol-1, Issue-4, October.2022
Ryan. R.M., Stiller. J.D., and Lynch. J.H. Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 226-249. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/027243169401400207.1994.
Koedinger. K.R., Corbett. A.T., and Perfetti. C. The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction framework: Bridging the science‐practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 757-798. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.2012.
Scales. P. C., Pekel. K., Sethi, J., Chamberlain. R., and Van Boekel, M. Academic year changes in student-teacher developmental relationships and their linkage to middle and high school students’ motivation: A mixed methods study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 40(4), 499-536. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/journals-permissions.2020.
Martin. F., and Bolliger. D.U. Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1179659.pdf.2018.
Shepard. L.A., Penuel W.R., and Pellegrino. J.W. Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large‐scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21-34. http://edmeasurement.net/MAG/Shepard-et-al-2018-EMIP-learning-motivation-assessment.pdf.2018.
Ergün. E., & Avcı. Ü. Knowledge sharing self-efficacy, motivation and sense of community as predictors of knowledge receiving and giving behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 60-73. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Uemmuehan-Avci/publication/326714204_Knowledge_Sharing_Self-Efficacy_Motivation_and_Sense_of_Community_as_Predictors_of_Knowledge_Receiving_and_Giving_Behaviors/links/63592be196e83c26eb583b30/Knowledge-Sharing-Self-Efficacy-Motivation-and-Sense-of-Community-as-Predictors-of-Knowledge-Receiving-and-Giving-Behaviors.pdf.2018.
Fletcher. T., and Ni Chroinín. D. Pedagogical principles that support the prioritisation of meaningful experiences in physical education: conceptual and practical considerations. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(5), 455-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1884672.2022.
Lavy. S., and Bocker. S. A path to teacher happiness? A sense of meaning affects teacher–student relationships, which affect job satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(5), 1485-1503. DOI 10.1007/s10902-017-9883-9.2018.
Cheong. K.M., Jano. Z., Salam. S., Bareed. N.A., Ithnin. F., and Suraidi. N..Motivational factors among undergraduates learning mandarin: A qualitative perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(2), 187-199. DOI: 10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i2/5694.2019.
Korthagen. F., Loughran. J., and Russell. T. Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1020-1041. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/19340/korthagen+-+developing+fundamental.2006.
Rivers.W. M. The Psychologist and the Foreign-Language Teacher. The Modern Language Journal, 48(3), p131-136.1964
Bruner.J. S. Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.1966.
Vygotsky.L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.1978.
Baker.R. S. Data Mining for Education. In C. Romero, S. Ventura, M. Pechenizkiy, & R. S. J. d. Baker (Eds.), Data Mining in E-Learning (p. 61-84). CRC Press.2009.
Koedinger.K. R. Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Past, Present, and Future. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouardères, & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 6th International Conference, ITS 2002 Biarritz, France and San Sebastián, Spain, June 2–7, 2002 Proceedings (p. 5-21). Springer.2002.
D'Mello.S. A Comprehensive Review of Multimodal Engagement and its Assessment in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25(2), p109-147.2015.
Smith.A. L. A Paradigm for the Development of Dynamic Conversational Agents. In Intelligent Virtual Agents (p. 338-344). Springer.2011
Lombardi.L. M. Conversational Agents in Educational Contexts: An Analysis of the Literature. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (p. 332-339).2019.
Hendler.J. A., & Khayrallah, H. Using AI to Augment Learning of English Grammar. In Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2019.
Hayath.T.M and Dr. Shashi.K.G. Pedagogical Principles in Learning and Its Impact on
Enhancing Motivation of Students. In Technoarete Transactions on Applications of Information and communication Technology (ICT) in Education. e-ISSN: 2583-3154. Vol-1, Issue-4, October 2022
.
